Tuesday

Got a Great Application Idea? Make it happen.


Full disclosure: I worked on this campaign, specifically in the digital realm. A ton of great people helped put it together and we're all extremely happy with the way users are engaging with it across the digital world. Let me know your (honest) thoughts here.

In early June, Rogers launched a national campaign to announce that Google Android devices had finally come to Canada. The two featured devices, the HTC Magic and Dream, are Google-enabled and loaded with excellent applications (from Latitude to YouTube). As an iPhone user, I was pretty skeptical about the capabilities of the device but after playing with it for over three months, I was hooked. The full keyboard makes a huge difference and there are a ton of apps that you can't (yet) get on the iPhone.

The campaign was launched through TV, print, OOH and a number of digital extensions - from a pre-launch microsite to YouTube page takeovers. Our campaign microsite used video and innovative technology to really bring the devices to life. Check it out here.

But the reason for this post is to discuss a Facebook contest that launched yesterday. With the launch of the iPhone, BlackBerry and Android platforms, everyone is starting to think about applications that they'd love to have on their phones. From games to maps, contacts to social networks, you can get just about anything. But if you could make your own application, what would it be?

That's the question that we've asked to our users and in just 24 hours and we've already had a ton of submissions. Each week, we are giving away a device to the top voted on idea and at the end of the contest, Rogers will select one to actually build for the user.

Users can submit their ideas via copy or mobile and it's extremely simple to submit your idea and reach out (read: spam) your friends for votes. Take a look at some of the submissions and feel free to put in your own.

I always love feedback to any campaign so please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments below. Thanks to everyone who was involved. Sweet work.

Must Know Twitter Stats

I was reading a great article today about a study done on Twitter. It contains 10 stunning stats that any advertiser should be aware of when they are building a campaign using the service. Here are two of my favorites:
  • Half of all Twitter users are not "active." If you take a general description of being "active" on Twitter to mean that you have posted a tweet at some point in the last 7 days (1 week), then the survey learned that 50.4% of all Twitter users fit this category. If you remove the 21% from point #1, this leaves about 30% of users who have an account and have tweeted before, but happen to be inactive now.
  • Twitter is being led by the social media geeks. This particular finding should likely come as no surprise, but 15% of Twitter users who follow more than 2000 people identify themselves as social media marketers. These individuals are more likely to post updates every day (sometimes more than once per day) and also use Twitter more actively for direct communication.
Love that the "Social Media Marketers" are leading the charge of Twitter. It's amazing how a lot of us feel the need to justify our experience across multiple platforms even though, deep down, we might not really see the need to use them. I know that a ton of these experts use the service and love it, but still. This is quite the finding and helps to show the flood of Twitter requests within the ad industry over the last few months.

Monday

How to ruin a perfectly good vacation...


Virgin Australia has just launched a new contest that revolves around Twitter. The contest asks people to apply for a trip to LA and the chance to win a round-the-world ticket from the airline. Winners get to go to LA for three days but there is a small, 140-character catch:

You have to post a Tweet every minute from their 3-day trip. That's 4320 tweets in 72 hours.

While I really like the site design (simple, straightforward writing), I don't know how much fun this prize would be for the winner - especially if you've never been to LA before. It's one thing to have a great experience, quite another to have to apologize to everyone you meet to post a Tweet every 60 seconds.

That being said, the amount of content that will be produced from this will be interesting. I don't know many Twitter users who would want to follow a person like this for 72 hours, but it could generate some good buzz for the contest and raise awareness around the trip (which I'm sure was the main objective).

What do you think? Would you enjoy LA if you had to tweet every minute of your trip?

Friday

Thanks Microsoft. You just made the worst ads of the year.

Warning: These ads are horrible. They will make you feel stupid, dirty and sad to be a part of an industry that took part in creating them. They represent what's wrong with advertising. Dumb agencies who place "shock-value" at the center of their creative instead of sound strategy that differentiates their product from their competitors. Clients who can be sold on anything and don't think about the consequences for their products.

If you created these ads, please quit the industry and find something new. I'd recommend something that involves you never leaving the house, talking to anyone or - God forbid - selling something. If you approved these ads, don't worry, you'll be fired soon. I just recommend never admitting to having a hand in them if you ever want to find another job as a marketer.

To the agency, Microsoft, media company and production groups, thanks for making all other work feel great in comparison to this awful campaign. When I think of IE8, I think of these spots. And I feel so, so, so much better for my Mac Book Pro and Firefox browser.

The spots are so bad I don't even want to put them on AdJoke. You can view the 60 here.

UPDATE: Valleywag just reported that Microsoft has pulled the ad. I guess that's what happens when you get a guy from Police Academy to direct your spots for you. Hey Microsoft, I hear the geek from 16 Candles is available to shoot your next awful campaign.

Tuesday

Why don't Canadians like online shopping?

A few days ago, the Marketing Magazine released an article (through research done by PayPal) that showed that 51% of Canadians were anxious when making a purchase online. The finding further found that 40% of Canadians don't believe that retailers are able to keep their credit card information safe.

Through research I've done recently on online shoppers, I've have found additional studies that show - in comparison to the US - Canadians are more likely to research their purchases online but less likely to actually buy.

A few sources have speculated why this might be occurring. For starters, online shopping become cheaper and easier to do in the US than in Canada. Furthermore, shipping costs in the US are now either nothing or baked into initial cost (typically). In Canada, they can be upwards of 10-15% on top of the purchase price - depending on the brand and where you live.

That being said, things aren't all that bad. According to eMarketer, Canadian's spent over $6.5 billion online last year and that number will certainly continue to grow.

But the question remains - when will Canadians as a whole feel comfortable with leaving the retail experience and buying most of their items via the web?

Sunday

Now that's smooth...



Really nice spot from Braun. Excellent execution which pays off the history of the brand as well as the main product benefit (smoothness). I love the idea of using subtle metrosexuality in a time that was anything but.

IKEA Sweden = nuts

If any of our readers can help enlighten me on what the hell this commercial is about that would be great.

Here is what I know:
  1. It is for Ikea Sweden
  2. It is banned
  3. It is really messed up

The Real World - Augmented

In the past few months, I've been working on a Google Android campaign and was lucky enough to spend a very months testing out the product and the Android market. I'm a big fan of mobile applications (especially for the iPhone) and think that in the next few years we're going to see some revolutionary ones coming out.

Here is one of them:



We've posted about augmented reality before but to be honest, there aren't very many practical applications for it out yet. I love this one and if anyone knows if it's available for the iPhone, let me know the name.

Thursday

The Kia Soul has some fun

Another Old School Ad


Tyler & I have been posting old school ads that we love, make us laugh or generally make us shake our head since basically day one.

Here is another beauty. Incredibly well written but the message still makes me shake my head.

Wednesday

An image worth sharing

I have always loved this quote and I happened to Stumble across it tonight on Flickr. I don't think it was a coincidence. Maybe I needed to be reminded.

Bing. The Decision Engine.

Why would they launch Bing with stock video and photography? Wouldn't they have more money to invest in a major product launch?



Now this post is about more than a low budget spot that doesn't really make any sense it is about an idea.

If your product is a search engine or as they say in the spot a "decision engine" that provides better search, better results and cuts through the crap then prove it. Why wouldn't they buy keywords on Google, Yahoo, Ask, and in the place of the text ads show the results that Bing would have delivered. With the cost of this crappy spot and the media buy think of the breadth of keywords and text ads that they could have purchased.

Imagine if BMW could put a car in an Audi dealership? Or vice-versa.

Toyota Harmony


When I first watched this commercial it felt like I was watching the commercial that would have been created if GRR, slept with Happiness Factory and had a 30-second spot baby.

Tuesday

Bing.com - "But It's Not Google..."

Over the last few weeks, I've made a conscious decision to switch from Google to Bing. Not because I think that Google is terrible (it's not) but because I think that Bing represents one of the largest challenges against Google's current search methods (other that where Twitter live search could take us).

A few quick thoughts on Bing:

  • Visuals create comfort - I love the way that the interface takes a geographic visual and adds it to the background of the browser everyday. It brings a comfort to search and strips away the analytical side that we're used too from Google and Yahoo. Unlike Google which is boring (but straightforward), I want to have Bing as my landing page
  • Omnipresent Navigation - it's the little things that make a big difference. I think one of the most common search behaviors is clicking the back button in a browser after you've clicked on a link that doesn't give you the information you want. Bing gets past this by keeping a log of past histories with you as you search through links
  • Adjustable Settings (Images) - When I'm creating a presentation, I used to use Google Images to find the perfect shot to help make my point. The problem with that was that half of the images are tiny, poor quality and unusable. With Bing, I can sort images by size and quality. Now, when I find an image I like, I know it can be used.
  • Quality of Search - I've done a few comparison searches on Bing and Google and found the quality to be similar in terms of results. That being said, Bing limits the amount of links whereas Google gives the user all 10 billion of them. I like the more limited approach because it seems less daunting to sort through a few pages vs. a million.
To promote Bing, Microsoft recently released this TV spot:



Even though it seems to talk to Google pretty directly, I like the tone of the spot and think that it will drive initial trial of the service. The key to search though, as Google knows, it to make your service the doorway to the internet in the individuals browser. Could Bing do this? Potentially.

Sunday

A New Way to Pitch


A few weeks ago, a new microsite launched in Canada called whatsinyourbudget.ca. Although that URL might sound like a government site explaining the current bailout package, it's not. It's from Elemental - a global agency (though the campaign is Toronto based) - and it's a call to action for marketers across Toronto to rethink their agencies.

Unlike the traditional RFP process that most brands make agencies go through, Elemental is asking interested brands to fill out a small form and apply for their services. The winning agency will receive free strategic and creative servies for the campaign of their choosing (any prodcution or media won't come with the deal but still, it's a great prize - especially for a small to mid-sized business).

The campaign launched with a large street team moving through the central agency district in Toronto the way a protest moves through the streets. A Twitter page has also been launched to help support the campaign and the microsite provides additional materials to check out and help spread the word.

So does something like this work?

According to a colleague, the answer is yes. In the first 24 hours, the agency received a few applications and I'd assume that they are going to receive at least 20-30 over the campaign period (they've got direct mail to help support as well). What I'm interested in is what brand they select to represent and how the relationship grows over time.

At the end of the day, most agencies just want one chance with a new client to show them their capabilities - a small brief or challenge. If the client isn't impressed, you move on. If they are, you can suddenly find yourself drowning in a ton of new briefs.

Thanks to Dustin for the heads up and all the links.

Thursday

Bye bye those big up front buys

I feel like the majority of AdJoke's rants are captured nicely in this video. To the tune of American Pie.



Thanks Dave.

Tuesday

"Global, Social, Ubiquitous and Cheap"

Media has changed. We all know this and have read through the statistics on usage, consumer habits and, of course, the decline of the print world. The old world models are over. The control is in the hands of the consumer and the conversation is totally uncontrolled.

To most people in the digital world, these ideas aren't new. But this TED talk, featuring new media guru Clay Shriky, is. What I love about the talk is that it provides context on how technology has changed the way media works and showcases case studies on the massive changes in our global culture.

Watch this talk as soon as you can and let the conversations begin.

Monday

100 Advocates

I had a great conversation tonight about shifting the way we think about advertising. Instead of thinking in terms of reach, frequency and impressions, let's think about interactions and individual customer experiences.

This way of thinking isn't new. Some top marketers rave about the importance of every customer interaction. Michael Dell comes to mind instantly. With a few horrible years of customer service and millions of product failures, Dell was on the decline. In order to keep the company relevant, Dell changed their vision to managing the life of the consumer - one interaction at a time.

Dell's strategy bang on. TV spots, billboards and display ads can only go so far. A great campaign can drive people in store but if the salesperson is too busy chatting with friends or unable to answer the most basic questions, the experience is ruined. Some people tell their friends about good ads but ALL people tell their friends about horrible experiences. I bet if you think about the last two weeks of your life you can remember at least three interactions that left a bad brand taste in your mouth (yes Air Canada, I'm talking to you).

So why don't we focus on the customer experience? A lot of brands think that they do. Through customer retention programs, special offers, etc. But many of these programs can be viewed as strategic ploys to simply up-sell (vs. provide added value). It's a good start - but we need to go much further.

Think about the Apple Genius program or the Amazon recommendation tool. These tools help me find things I wasn't even looking for. They qualify me based on my tastes and they are specific. They do a great job adding value and help enhance my desires - not the desires of a Canadian male who is 25-34. Mine.

So what can we do in addition to focusing on the customer experience? I think we need to make a constant effort to find the 100 people who love our brand most. And enable them to share their passion with their networks of friends. That sharing could then lead to more experiences, more sharing and more passion for the brand.

What if we could identify the 100 people who loved our brand most? How would that change our campaign or media plan? What sort of reach would they have if we enabled them - through digital - to talk about their authentic experiences and engage in conversations with people offering products that they are thrilled with?

Would we still spend millions of dollars in media with the hopes of influencing a few? In the short term, yes. But harnessing the voices of our passionate loyalists could yield amazing results. And if anyone knows strategies on how to find them, I'd love to hear them.

Don't get me wrong - mass advertising has a huge place in our world; especially when it comes to awareness objectives. I love TV spots, branded content and digital experiences. But I think a balanced approach of advertising and customer service (and indivudalized experiences) builds powerful brands together. It's impossible to have a great brand that falls short on one of those pillars.

In short, think about the good brand experiences that you have and keep sharing them. And the bad ones? Scream them as loud as you can.

Thursday

Social Media's Fatal Flaw


This morning, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails wrote a long post on his NIN forum about why he is going to be leaving social media.

In the last number of years, NIN and Reznor have led the social media charge. They ditched their label, created one of the best ARG's out there and have been active in forums, Twitter and any new technology that helps them connect better with their fans. Like Radiohead, they released one of their albums via the web and allowed users to pay what they felt it deserved.

When I think about social media, NIN is always one of the brands that first comes to mind. They've been there, connecting with their fans on a one-to-one level, personalizing the converastion, giving access to everypart of their everyday lives. A dream for a hardcore NIN fan.

But not for Trent.

For every 100 fans, followers or comments, there are always 3-4 that go over the top. They might be racist, they might be sexist, hell, they might even be death threats. Fact is, there are psycho people out there and the anonymity of the web allows them to say and do whatever they want. You can try to get rid of them - cancel their profiles, ban their email addresses, restrict their access. But they create another profile, they sidestep your best efforts and they do whatever it takes to ruin a great discussion.

Why? Because they don't have lives. They are, in the truest sense, sad losers. And Trent has had it with them:

"I will be tuning out of the social networking sites because at the end of the day it's now doing more harm than good in the bigger picture and the experiment seems to have yielded a result. Idiots rule."

This is the dirty secret of social media - the ability to be anonymous. To say what you want without consequence. To be whatever you can't be in real life. In some cases, it's a good thing but in most cases, it allows a-holes like the ones who eventually rode Trent off social media to run wild doing whatever they want.

Is the solution networks that verify identification through government issued ID? Maybe.

But for now, social media has a problem and only a few people have spent enough time in it to realize the extent of it. We just lost one of them.

Tuesday

Sound Familiar?

I'm a big fan of music in spots. A great track can take an average spot and put it over the top. A bad track can take a great idea and make it terrible. If I think back to some of my favorite spots of all tie, they've all got a perfect song behind them.

So when I saw this spot from Chivas, I couldn't help but think about one that we blogged about a few months ago:



Not bad. But I still prefer this one:



What do you think?

Sunday

Should GM be making new ads?

I really don't know. For a company that's just declared bankruptcy, received billions of dollars from governments across the world and is closing dealerships at an alarming rate, should they be investing in a 60 second spot with a huge North American media buy? (even though they already owe their media agency over $75 million dollars?)



When I first viewed this ad this week, it made me angry. We're not witnessing the "reinvention of GM". We're witnessing a company that failed to recognize the dramatic shift in customer desires. A management group that didn't react to cheaper competitors by building smarter, but by building bigger, less efficient cars.

Most companies would have to pay the price of going out of business. GM, with it's thousands of workers, must keep on going to keep the economy afloat. And they are being forced to make dramatic changes, I just wonder where this execution came from.

I have a feeling that it was created to help manage the negative perceptions about the company (a few that I've just shared). This spot is designed to get people thinking differently about the bad GM headlines they read every morning. GM hopes, it seems, that we will recognize that things are changing for the better and the company is going to make smart decisions in the near future - cutting down brands, building more fuel efficient cars, etc.

It just feels a bit strange and maybe slightly too soon. I've seen this spot with different groups of people and they've all had the same reaction - well that was nice. I guess I just paid for it.

I think that these perceptions will change over time and maybe GM wanted to get on the airwaves fast to move people along. But still, for a company that has just received massive amounts of public money, it seems a bit strange to be spending millions on a media buy just to tell everyone that they've changed.

We know you have.

Tuesday

Molson's 2010 Wall Mural and what it should have been


Is this campaign a case of digital agency vs. mass agency, of clients hungry for a UGC campaign or just really bad brand management by the marketing team? Whatever it is, it is wrong.

The 2010 wall mural is on it's own a decent thought. Not quite an idea and definitely not a campaign but it is a nice thought. Where the idea falls flat is that it was done by Molson Canadian who recently has launched a excellent spot (see below and following links) that continues it's long standing direction and takes me back to the days of "The Rant".



Now you ask so what is his problem with "The mural"? My problem is that is has nothing to do with the brand campaign. The unwritten code is the campaign and I know they could have done a dozen better campaigns that were integrated and supported the overall brand positioning.

As I always like to do I am going to open myself up and put out an idea (not a thought) that I feel would better deliver the brand and support the campaign.

What would I do?

So I have a feeling the client wanted to engage the country, capitalize on the Olympic sponsorship and of course continue to drive brand awareness and preference.

I would have asked Canada to help Molson Canadian write the code that all visitors to Canada should abide by while they are here for the Olympics. What can they do to truly experience the code of Canadians while they are here? Through this UGC campaign site visitors would submit and vote on the code of Canada that will allow Olympic tourists to discover more than soapstone carvings, maple syrup, poutine, snow, sleds, igloos and polar bears. This UGC created and user voted code could be handed to visitors as they exit planes at YVR, through-out the city then through street teams, installations and booths through-out the city tourists can have experience the code like curving a stick with a torch, jerseying a guy, using your arm as an ice scraper, tying boots with mittens on.... you get the idea.

Is this an amazing idea? Maybe not but it supports the brand, extends the campaign to the digital space, capatilizes on the Olympics in a truly Canadian way and is way better than the 2010 Wall Mural campaign. Which by the way they didn't even buy the URL 2010wallmural.ca or.com... no they made it extremely difficult to find it. Seriously search 2010 wall mural on Google. Nothing on the first two pages, no SEM no unique URL purchases...nothing at all. I am not even linking to it so good luck finding it.

Monday

Looking back and forward

Both of these images were originally posted back in early 2007 . I was searching for an old post today and came across them and felt the need to share them again. Back when they were first posted we were lucky to see 15 visitors a day so I figured it wouldn't hurt to share them again.

Imagination in my mind makes knowledge possible. We learn because we are curious, we are curious because we wonder, we wonder because we have an imagination. Albert Einstein was correct.


Now, onto banksy. Being a believer in the creativity, intelligence and ambition of those that I have the pleasure to work with I agree with his sentiments about the advertising industry, but at the same time I believe that we can change the way we advertise to use our collective talents to create so much more. Advertising that creates art, emotion and through true brand experiences creates desire. A desire to support a brand that believes the same things that we believe in, that supports the same causes that we support and that seeks to evolve with us, discover with us and be a part of something more than a product and a message.

What is the agency model of the future?

I’ve had a number of discussions lately with a number of people about what the future of the ad agency business model might look like. With agencies across the world seeing clients demand much more for less, networks being forced to make massive layoffs due to the global economy and slashing departments that don’t bring in revenue like they used too, we are bound for a large change in the near future.

For some agencies, this change has already been occurring through digital. Clients have gradually (5 years or less) shifted their marketing budgets from mass to digital. Traditional agencies who saw this sea change and were able to prepare for it have been well positioned for the future. Digital-specific shops, once viewed as the ‘black-box web experts’, are now seeing huge competition from brands that they never expected. There is no denying that even in this economy, digital-capable agencies continue to see substantial growth opportunities.

Does this mean in 5 years all successful agencies will be rooted in digital? Maybe. Most large Canadian clients still use over 80% of their budgets in mediums that aren’t digital. TV is not going away anytime soon and, I suspect, OOH, retail and direct will continue to play a role in large, integrated campaigns. But even though some traditional areas will remain strong, they are going to experience full-scale changes.

These changes aren’t due to different agency models popping up. They are because of the consumer. If you have a web-connection, PVR and, well, a brain, chances are you get the content the way you want it - without ads. I’m obsessed with advertising but in the last twelve months I’ve become more obsessed with the FFWD button on my remote. When you’re watching something you like, you don’t want to be interrupted.

Smart brands are dealing with this in a few ways - branded content, crowdsoucring new ideas, connecting like-minded consumers with new communities, etc. I do believe that these savvy brands have been guided by their agencies to think differently and try ideas that might scare them and, almost more importantly, might fail.

A colleague of mine frequently says that forward thinking brands need to embrace failure and learn from it. Treat small tests as chances to learn and keep doing things that you haven’t tried. There is nothing worse than seeing the same media plan, campaign after campaign, with nobody questioning it because - well - that’s what we did before.

So what does this all mean for the agencies of tomorrow? For starters, we need people who are willing to scare clients and ‘sell’ them on ideas their not originally comfortable with. But even more than that, we need to think about how the relationship might change in the future.

For example, Coke has recently announced that they have chanced the compensation model with a number of their agencies. Instead of agreeing to an upfront rate, or retainer, they have mapped out clear, business objectives for the agency to work towards. If these objectives are hit, the agency receives up-to 30% more revenue than their fee. If they fail to meet the objective, they are only compensated for the hard-cost incurred for the project. Coke is calling it a ‘value-based’ model and with a huge brand like this embracing it, other companies might be picking up the phone soon to talk about compensation changes.

When I discussed this model with a CD recently, he brought up a good point - how much control does Coke now have in the approval of the work? If they are going to be tying the agency to specific targets than shouldn’t the agency have more of a say in the approval process? Ideally, yes. In practice? Doubtful.

Other agencies, like CP+B, have invested in Venture Capital divisions. They not only represent large brands, they also help to create them. I think this changes the agency-client relationship dramatically. When your group owns a percentage of the business, it helps to align them - 100% - with key business objectives. It also gives the agency an ability to be treated as a partner vs. a vendor. Scary for some clients who crave total control, liberating for others who want a passionate partner.

Whatever the model, things are changing. The question is, what will you do and, more specifically, what model do you think agencies should adopt to succeed in the future?

Sunday

Trimming the bush to make the tree look taller.



This video contains a lot of firsts for Adjoke. I never thought our blog would carry an informational video on how men should properly shave down there but since it is an ad for Gillette here it is.